If you’ve been deep in wedding planning, you’ve probably noticed that wedding photography costs more than most other types of photography except maybe high fashion. A portrait session might cost a few hundred dollars, while a wedding can run into the thousands. The difference isn’t just about the number of hours worked it’s about everything that goes into capturing a wedding in a way that’s artistic and meaningful.

With most types of photography portraits, commercial shoots, even events there’s room for do-overs. If a brand doesn’t like their campaign photos, they can reshoot. If a headshot isn’t right, the person can book another session. Weddings don’t have that luxury.
A wedding photographer gets one chance to capture a moment. That means we have to be prepared for everything low light, fast-moving moments, unpredictable weather, shifting schedules, and the chaos of a hundred people all doing different things at once.
We don’t just show up and take photos; we anticipate moments before they happen, adjust on the fly, and make sure nothing important is missed.

A wedding photographer isn’t just working the eight to ten hours of the actual wedding. The process starts long before that and continues long after:

Wedding photographers invest tens of twenties of thousands of dollars into their equipment. High-end cameras, multiple lenses, flashes, lighting setups, memory cards, and backup systems are all essential. Unlike a studio photographer who can control the environment, we have to be prepared for any lighting condition—dark churches, bright midday sun, candlelit receptions.
And because there are no second chances in wedding photography, we have to carry backups of everything. If a camera fails mid-ceremony, we need another one ready immediately. That level of preparedness comes at a cost.
Then our computers, most of us have multiple of them, and they have to be top tier often in the 5k plus cost range with storage and ram capacity.
If you’re getting married in New York or Philly, you’ve probably already seen the numbers. Most experienced photographers charge somewhere between $5,000 and $15,000 for full wedding coverage. Some go higher, especially in the luxury market, while others charge less, but may offer limited coverage, minimal editing, or be newer to the industry.
I’ve spent years refining my approach—documenting weddings in a way that feels like movie stills and intentional without being intrusive. I work with couples who value real moments over staged ones, and I structure my pricing to reflect that.

I shoot both 35mm film and digital, which means you’re getting something deeper than standard wedding photos. Film has a richness, imperfection, and texture that digital can’t replicate. Blending the two creates a fuller, more honest story of your day. As well a the extra cost of film, to demystify its around 50-60 a roll for high resolution scans plus the film, and the additional camera bodies some cost me well over 2k per body. And the extra step of sending in or hand delivering the film to my scan store.
You’re paying for more than just someone with a camera. I am a real artist and truly love my work. With so many years in this field I know how to anticipate moments, and document the energy of the day without forcing anything. I capture what’s actually happening without making it feel like a wedding factory assembly line.
Other photographers with a similar artistic, film-based style in NYC and Philly charge anywhere from $10,000-$15,000 for this level of storytelling. I Really try to keep my pricing in the middle end of this margin, I am also middle class and love working with folks I can relate to, and can relate to me. As well as preferring a more laid back wedding vs the 500k productions that tend to want the 15-30k wedding photographer and to be publish in vogue, of course I care about vogue in theory, I have an ego, but I don’t read vogue and I really don’t care.
The publication industry is also all smoke and mirrors they only publish weddings that are 500K productions with similar looking white washed couples or celebrities, occasionally sprinkle in the outlier, but even Anti bride looks like traditional wedding photography. Anti Bride also charges wedding photographers who submit over 2k to be published so even tho yes they choose you out of millions of submissions they charge you money to actually get published.
I hope this helped to illuminate more about pricing and about my price structure and a little about the industry.

Chasing all the colors ! Beautiful wedding at colonial damns in Philly on 35mm film ..
Florals @yoonkimflora
Dj @luvdupdjs
Reception band @snacktime
Planning @olivestreetevents
Catering @middlechildphiladelphia
@metropolitanbakery
Dance venue @maskandwigevents
Ceremony venue
@colonialdamesofamerica
Photo @giannaleofalcon
This may actually be the best photo I’ve ever taken ! With the loveliest couple ever loved working for you guys !
Suit & Tie: @moss
Shoes: Dr Marten @drmartensofficial
Two Piece: @oldmuse.limited Shoes: @airandgrace
Florals: @call.her.sunny
cooper union art kids ! <3 passing on my way to shoot a wedding at 6bc last week.
Black and white street photo taken in new york city on the mark iii R6
Sisi and Carl called me from Puerto Rico for our intro call ! I was so excited for thir elopement so many intersecting energies like how did you choose Stroudsburg ? Loved you guys .. photos of their wedding in my mountain town ! By a water fall ! :))) you two are so sweet ❤️
Ceremony: Marshall’s Falls
Restaurant: Farmhouse main st
Flowers: @hickorygrovegardens
Cake: Jordan Taylor’s sweet & treats (@jt_sweetandtreats)
Dress: @kamperett
Shoes: @loq
Crochet collar & headpiece: Antonia Rossi @Antomoon
Wedding decor/coordination: @thahleah
Lauren and Jake in this amazing soho elopement. Im totally in love with these and clearly love my city hall weddings.
Suit - @boss
Dress - @anthropologieweddings
Rings - @ringconcierge
Shoes - @manoloblahnik
Florals - @qgfloral
Hair - salon87
City hall elopement shot on 35mm film with a portrait session in Soho NYC after